Gajanan Shankar Narwade vs State of Maha (PSO Lonar) Advocate - APP — 36/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 20th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln.
CNR: MHBU200000872026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
68/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
36/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
District Court and Addl.Sessions Court, Mehkar
Judge
1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
433
Police Station
Lonar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gajanan Shankar Narwade
Adv. Bhagat A.A
Respondent(s)
State of Maha (PSO Lonar) Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge-1 and Additional Sess.Judge
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court approved the regular bail application of Gajanan Shankar Narwade, accused of rape and other charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 64(2)(k), 64(2)(m), 69, and 351(2). The judge found contradictions in the victim's statements, medical evidence inconsistent with forced sexual assault, and noted the investigation was complete, making continued detention unnecessary. Bail was granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 with strict conditions including non-contact with the victim and witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court approved the regular bail application of Gajanan Shankar Narwade, accused of rape and other charges under IPC Sections 64(1), 64(2)(k), 64(2)(m), 69, and 351(2). The judge found contradictions in the victim's statements, medical evidence inconsistent with forced sexual assault, and noted the investigation was complete, making continued detention unnecessary. Bail was granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 with strict conditions including non-contact with the victim and witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts