State of Maharashatra through Police Station Sakharkherda vs Shaikh Sattar Shaikh Gapfur — 172/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12a. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU190002792026
Filing Number
240/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Divison and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sindhkhed-Raja
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0074
Police Station
Sakharkherda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashatra through Police Station Sakharkherda
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shaikh Sattar Shaikh Gapfur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sindkhed Raja convicted Shaikh Sattar under Section 12A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, for engaging in gambling (Warli Matka) in a public place on 19.02.2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges explained in Marathi, and was sentenced to simple imprisonment till the rising of court, a fine of ₹300 (or one day imprisonment in default), forfeiture of ₹210 seized amount, and destruction of gambling instruments after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 172/2026
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sindkhed Raja convicted Shaikh Sattar under Section 12A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, for engaging in gambling (Warli Matka) in a public place on 19.02.2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges explained in Marathi, and was sentenced to simple imprisonment till the rising of court, a fine of ₹300 (or one day imprisonment in default), forfeiture of ₹210 seized amount, and destruction of gambling instruments after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts