Manesh Shivaji Wagh vs Police Station Adhikari, Police station Kingavraja — 17/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 24th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHBU190002322026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2026
Filing Number
198/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
17/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Divison and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sindhkhed-Raja
Judge
3-2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manesh Shivaji Wagh
Adv. MEHETRE RAMESHWAR NARAYANRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Police Station Adhikari, Police station Kingavraja
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The Judicial Magistrate rejected the criminal miscellaneous application filed by Manesh against the State. The applicant's advocate withdrew the application after the court found that the vehicle claimed by the applicant differed from the vehicle seized by the investigating officer in connection with the crime, as evidenced by the seizure panchanama and charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on Exh
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
16-Mar-2026
Steps
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
04-Mar-2026
Hearing
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
02-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
27-Feb-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2026
The Judicial Magistrate rejected the criminal miscellaneous application filed by Manesh against the State. The applicant's advocate withdrew the application after the court found that the vehicle claimed by the applicant differed from the vehicle seized by the investigating officer in connection with the crime, as evidenced by the seizure panchanama and charge-sheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts