State of Maharashtra vs Bismila Bi Tamboli — 40/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU190000692023

Filing Number

60/2023

Filing Date

24-Jan-2023

Registration No

40/2023

Registration Date

24-Jan-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Divison and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sindhkhed-Raja

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

351

Police Station

Sakharkherda

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Bismila Bi Tamboli

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

Order on Exhibit

The court discharged accused Bismilla B. Tamboli in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (u/s 65(e)) by closing proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The discharge was granted because the investigating officer failed to file the required chemical analysis report despite sufficient opportunity, and the prosecution could not secure witness presence, making proof impossible in this summary trial that required expeditious disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
09-Mar-2026

Awaiting Summons

Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
21-Nov-2025

Awaiting Summons

Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
01-Sep-2025

Awaiting Summons

Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
30-Aug-2024

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
12-Oct-2023

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
24-Jan-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Jan-2023

Case filed

Registration No. 40/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Bismilla B. Tamboli in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (u/s 65(e)) by closing proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The discharge was granted because the investigating officer failed to file the required chemical analysis report despite sufficient opportunity, and the prosecution could not secure witness presence, making proof impossible in this summary trial that required expeditious disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.