State of Maharashtra Through PSO Sonala vs Hari Pundlik Talokar. — 466/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180008912025

Filing Number

713/2025

Filing Date

07-Jul-2025

Registration No

466/2025

Registration Date

07-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

165

Police Station

Sonala

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Sonala

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hari Pundlik Talokar.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court suspended criminal proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against the accused (Hari) in this excise/revenue case (Case No. 466/2025). The court found that the chemical analysis report had not been submitted despite the chargesheet being filed, making conviction unlikely, and therefore stayed proceedings. The accused was released, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized goods were directed to be handed over to the State Excise Department Commissioner for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 07-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 466/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court suspended criminal proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against the accused (Hari) in this excise/revenue case (Case No. 466/2025). The court found that the chemical analysis report had not been submitted despite the chargesheet being filed, making conviction unlikely, and therefore stayed proceedings. The accused was released, bail bonds were cancelled, and seized goods were directed to be handed over to the State Excise Department Commissioner for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case