State of Maharashtra Through PSO Sonala vs Shuddhodhan Jayram Wankhade. — 457/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180008602025

Filing Number

686/2025

Filing Date

04-Jul-2025

Registration No

457/2025

Registration Date

04-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

158

Police Station

Sonala

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Sonala

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shuddhodhan Jayram Wankhade.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court suspended criminal proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against accused Shuddhodhan in case no. 457/2025 due to the investigation officer's failure to submit a chemical analysis report despite filing the chargesheet, making conviction unlikely. The accused was acquitted, bail bond cancelled, and seized contraband was ordered destroyed by the Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 04-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 04-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 457/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court suspended criminal proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against accused Shuddhodhan in case no. 457/2025 due to the investigation officer's failure to submit a chemical analysis report despite filing the chargesheet, making conviction unlikely. The accused was acquitted, bail bond cancelled, and seized contraband was ordered destroyed by the Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case