State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon. vs Gautam Shankar Gavhande. — 430/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU180008132025
Filing Number
646/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
430/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
50
Police Station
Tamgaon
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Gautam Shankar Gavhande.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 08-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 03-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 01-07-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary In case FIR No. 430/2025 (Government v. Gautam), the court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to pending chemical analysis reports from the investigation officer. The court found that without the analytical report, the trial would likely fail, and ordered the accused's acquittal and release, canceling the bail bond. Seized materials were directed to the State Excise Commissioner for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In case FIR No. 430/2025 (Government v. Gautam), the court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to pending chemical analysis reports from the investigation officer. The court found that without the analytical report, the trial would likely fail, and ordered the accused's acquittal and release, canceling the bail bond. Seized materials were directed to the State Excise Commissioner for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts