State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon. vs Gautam Shankar Gavhande. — 430/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180008132025

Filing Number

646/2025

Filing Date

01-Jul-2025

Registration No

430/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Tamgaon

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gautam Shankar Gavhande.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary In case FIR No. 430/2025 (Government v. Gautam), the court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to pending chemical analysis reports from the investigation officer. The court found that without the analytical report, the trial would likely fail, and ordered the accused's acquittal and release, canceling the bail bond. Seized materials were directed to the State Excise Commissioner for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 08-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 01-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 430/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In case FIR No. 430/2025 (Government v. Gautam), the court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to pending chemical analysis reports from the investigation officer. The court found that without the analytical report, the trial would likely fail, and ordered the accused's acquittal and release, canceling the bail bond. Seized materials were directed to the State Excise Commissioner for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case