State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon. vs Rajesh Sampat Alias Santosh Suralkar. — 426/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180008062025

Filing Number

641/2025

Filing Date

25-Jun-2025

Registration No

426/2025

Registration Date

25-Jun-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

327

Police Station

Tamgaon

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Rajesh Sampat Alias Santosh Suralkar.

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court suspended criminal proceedings against the accused Rajesh under CrPC Section 258 due to the investigating officer's failure to submit the chemical analysis report along with the chargesheet, making conviction unlikely. The accused was acquitted, his bail bond was cancelled, and seized materials were directed to be returned to the State Excise Department after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
08-Dec-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
03-Dec-2025

Awaiting Summons

Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
25-Jun-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
25-Jun-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 426/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court suspended criminal proceedings against the accused Rajesh under CrPC Section 258 due to the investigating officer's failure to submit the chemical analysis report along with the chargesheet, making conviction unlikely. The accused was acquitted, his bail bond was cancelled, and seized materials were directed to be returned to the State Excise Department after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.