State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon. vs Ramdas Govinda Nrupnarayan. — 424/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180008042025

Filing Number

639/2025

Filing Date

25-Jun-2025

Registration No

424/2025

Registration Date

25-Jun-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

204

Police Station

Tamgaon

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramdas Govinda Nrupnarayan.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR 424/2025, State v. Ramdas), the court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to incomplete investigation. The investigation officer had not submitted the chemical analysis report despite filing the chargesheet, and the case was likely to be dismissed. The court consequently discharged the accused, cancelled his bail bond, and directed the seized goods to be transferred to the Excise Department Commissioner for disposal according to appeal deadlines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 08-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 25-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 424/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR 424/2025, State v. Ramdas), the court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to incomplete investigation. The investigation officer had not submitted the chemical analysis report despite filing the chargesheet, and the case was likely to be dismissed. The court consequently discharged the accused, cancelled his bail bond, and directed the seized goods to be transferred to the Excise Department Commissioner for disposal according to appeal deadlines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case