State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon. vs Dnyaneshwar Gajanan Jadhav. — 417/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180007912025

Filing Number

632/2025

Filing Date

24-Jun-2025

Registration No

417/2025

Registration Date

24-Jun-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

326

Police Station

Tamgaon

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dnyaneshwar Gajanan Jadhav.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against the accused Gyaneshwar due to the investigating officer's failure to submit the chemical analysis report despite filing the chargesheet. Finding the case unlikely to succeed without this crucial evidence, the court acquitted the accused, cancelled the bail bond, and directed the confiscated material to be destroyed as per regulations after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 24-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 417/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 against the accused Gyaneshwar due to the investigating officer's failure to submit the chemical analysis report despite filing the chargesheet. Finding the case unlikely to succeed without this crucial evidence, the court acquitted the accused, cancelled the bail bond, and directed the confiscated material to be destroyed as per regulations after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case