State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon. vs Sandip Baliram Jamav. — 416/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180007902025

Filing Number

631/2025

Filing Date

24-Jun-2025

Registration No

416/2025

Registration Date

24-Jun-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

191

Police Station

Tamgaon

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandip Baliram Jamav.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court suspended criminal proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to the investigating officer's failure to submit the chemical analysis report, finding that proceeding without such crucial evidence would likely result in acquittal. Consequently, the accused was released from custody, bail bond was cancelled, and seized goods were directed to be forwarded to the State Excise Officer for proper disposal pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 24-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 416/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court suspended criminal proceedings under CrPC Section 258 due to the investigating officer's failure to submit the chemical analysis report, finding that proceeding without such crucial evidence would likely result in acquittal. Consequently, the accused was released from custody, bail bond was cancelled, and seized goods were directed to be forwarded to the State Excise Officer for proper disposal pending appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case