State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon. vs Shrikrushna Gopal Wankhade. — 415/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180007892025

Filing Number

630/2025

Filing Date

24-Jun-2025

Registration No

415/2025

Registration Date

24-Jun-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

209

Police Station

Tamgaon

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shrikrushna Gopal Wankhade.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 in the case State vs. Shrikrishna, finding that critical chemical analysis reports had not been submitted despite the investigation officer filing the chargesheet. Due to the absence of essential forensic evidence, the court discharged the accused, cancelled his bail bond, and directed the seized goods be returned to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 24-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 415/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court suspended proceedings under CrPC Section 258 in the case State vs. Shrikrishna, finding that critical chemical analysis reports had not been submitted despite the investigation officer filing the chargesheet. Due to the absence of essential forensic evidence, the court discharged the accused, cancelled his bail bond, and directed the seized goods be returned to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case