Dhanashri Jivan Borse. vs Jivan Ramdas Borse. — 49/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU180007842024
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
189/2024
Filing Date
21-08-2024
Registration No
49/2024
Registration Date
21-08-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dhanashri Jivan Borse.
Adv. Mohammad Irfan
Respondent(s)
Jivan Ramdas Borse.
Chandrabhagabai Ramdas Borse.
Sunita Suresh Borse.
Dnyashwar Ramdas Borse.
Santosh Ramdas Borse.
Ganesh Ramdas Borse.
Ashish Suresh Borse.
Savita Shivshankar Punde.
Shital Dnyaneshwar Punde.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Hearing Without W.S.
Ex-Parte Order
Awaiting Summons
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing Without W.S. |
| 12-02-2026 | Ex-Parte Order |
| 01-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-11-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for temporary injunction (status quo) filed by plaintiff Dhanashree in a partition suit against defendant Jeevan has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately define the status quo relief sought, provide immediate reasons for apprehension, or demonstrate any change in circumstances, and therefore did not establish grounds for ex parte relief without hearing the defendants. The court noted that any requested relief can be reconsidered after the defendants appear in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for temporary injunction (status quo) filed by plaintiff Dhanashree in a partition suit against defendant Jeevan has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately define the status quo relief sought, provide immediate reasons for apprehension, or demonstrate any change in circumstances, and therefore did not establish grounds for ex parte relief without hearing the defendants. The court noted that any requested relief can be reconsidered after the defendants appear in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts