Dhanashri Jivan Borse. vs Jivan Ramdas Borse. — 49/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHBU180007842024

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Next Hearing

15th July 2026

Filing Number

189/2024

Filing Date

21-08-2024

Registration No

49/2024

Registration Date

21-08-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Dhanashri Jivan Borse.

Adv. Mohammad Irfan

Respondent(s)

Jivan Ramdas Borse.

Chandrabhagabai Ramdas Borse.

Sunita Suresh Borse.

Dnyashwar Ramdas Borse.

Santosh Ramdas Borse.

Ganesh Ramdas Borse.

Ashish Suresh Borse.

Savita Shivshankar Punde.

Shital Dnyaneshwar Punde.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

29-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

11-03-2026

Hearing Without W.S.

12-02-2026

Ex-Parte Order

01-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

13-11-2025

Compliance

Interim Orders

11-10-2024
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The application for temporary injunction (status quo) filed by plaintiff Dhanashree in a partition suit against defendant Jeevan has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately define the status quo relief sought, provide immediate reasons for apprehension, or demonstrate any change in circumstances, and therefore did not establish grounds for ex parte relief without hearing the defendants. The court noted that any requested relief can be reconsidered after the defendants appear in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The application for temporary injunction (status quo) filed by plaintiff Dhanashree in a partition suit against defendant Jeevan has been rejected. The court found that the plaintiff failed to adequately define the status quo relief sought, provide immediate reasons for apprehension, or demonstrate any change in circumstances, and therefore did not establish grounds for ex parte relief without hearing the defendants. The court noted that any requested relief can be reconsidered after the defendants appear in the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case