State of Maharashtra through P S Forest Dept. Sonala vs Mujahid Beg Roshan Beg 1 Advocate - Bawaskar KP — 216/2020

Case under Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 26(1)F. Status: Citation. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Citation Next hearing 22-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHBU180005772020

Filing Number

462/2020

Filing Date

24-Aug-2020

Registration No

216/2020

Registration Date

24-Aug-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Wild Life (Protection) Act Section 26(1)F
Indian Forest Act Section 27,31,50,51

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through P S Forest Dept. Sonala

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mujahid Beg Roshan Beg 1 Advocate - Bawaskar KP

  2. 2.Abarar Beg Roshan Beg

    Adv. Bawaskar KP

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-May-2026

    Citation

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  3. 04-Apr-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 21-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    SUMMARY The application filed by motorcycle owner Roshan Beg Kadar Beg under Section 451 of the CrPC for custody of his seized motorcycle was rejected. The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to pass any order regarding property seized under the Indian Forest Act, particularly since the Akot Wildlife Department had already confiscated the motorcycle under Section 61-A of the Indian Forest Act, which grants exclusive authority to authorized officers or Sessions Judge over such matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  9. 08-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  11. 07-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  12. 25-Jul-2025

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  13. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  14. 30-May-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  15. 24-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  16. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  17. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  18. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  19. 11-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  20. 09-May-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  21. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  22. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  23. 03-May-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  24. 02-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  25. 27-Jul-2022

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  26. 23-Feb-2022

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  27. 27-Oct-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  28. 26-Aug-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  29. 10-Jun-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  30. 02-Mar-2021

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  31. 11-Dec-2020

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  32. 24-Aug-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 24-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 216/2020

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The application filed by motorcycle owner Roshan Beg Kadar Beg under Section 451 of the CrPC for custody of his seized motorcycle was rejected. The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to pass any order regarding property seized under the Indian Forest Act, particularly since the Akot Wildlife Department had already confiscated the motorcycle under Section 61-A of the Indian Forest Act, which grants exclusive authority to authorized officers or Sessions Judge over such matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case