State of Maharashtra Through PSO Sonala vs Vitthal Kisan Gawande. Advocate - Bawaskar KP — 277/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180005192025

Filing Number

410/2025

Filing Date

23-Apr-2025

Registration No

277/2025

Registration Date

23-Apr-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

97

Police Station

Sonala

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Sonala

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vitthal Kisan Gawande. Advocate - Bawaskar KP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court suspended criminal proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the accused Vitthal due to missing chemical analysis reports from the investigating officer, which weakened the prosecution's case. The accused was discharged and released, with the bail bond cancelled and seized materials transferred to the Excise Department Superintendent pending appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 23-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 277/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court suspended criminal proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the accused Vitthal due to missing chemical analysis reports from the investigating officer, which weakened the prosecution's case. The accused was discharged and released, with the bail bond cancelled and seized materials transferred to the Excise Department Superintendent pending appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case