State of Maharashtra through P.S. Sonala vs Sainath Dadarao Shinde Advocate - Bawaskar KP — 150/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHBU180005082021

Case disposed

Filing Number

376/2021

Filing Date

01-07-2021

Registration No

150/2021

Registration Date

01-07-2021

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 324,323,504,34

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra through P.S. Sonala

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sainath Dadarao Shinde Advocate - Bawaskar KP

Gajanan Dadarao Shinde

Adv. Bawaskar KP

Sau. Harabai Dadarao Shinde

Adv. Bawaskar KP

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

06-05-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Compliance

04-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-12-2025

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

06-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Sainath Dadarao Shinde, Gajanan Dadarao Shinde, and Harabai Dadarao Shinde) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 323, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the complainant-witness could not credibly support the prosecution's case and no corroborating evidence was presented. The court held that without substantive witness testimony establishing the alleged assault and injury, the accusations could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Sainath Dadarao Shinde, Gajanan Dadarao Shinde, and Harabai Dadarao Shinde) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 323, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the complainant-witness could not credibly support the prosecution's case and no corroborating evidence was presented. The court held that without substantive witness testimony establishing the alleged assault and injury, the accusations could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case