State of Maharashtra through P.S. Sonala vs Sainath Dadarao Shinde Advocate - Bawaskar KP — 150/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU180005082021
Filing Number
376/2021
Filing Date
01-07-2021
Registration No
150/2021
Registration Date
01-07-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra through P.S. Sonala
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sainath Dadarao Shinde Advocate - Bawaskar KP
Gajanan Dadarao Shinde
Adv. Bawaskar KP
Sau. Harabai Dadarao Shinde
Adv. Bawaskar KP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Compliance
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 04-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Sainath Dadarao Shinde, Gajanan Dadarao Shinde, and Harabai Dadarao Shinde) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 323, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the complainant-witness could not credibly support the prosecution's case and no corroborating evidence was presented. The court held that without substantive witness testimony establishing the alleged assault and injury, the accusations could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all three accused (Sainath Dadarao Shinde, Gajanan Dadarao Shinde, and Harabai Dadarao Shinde) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 323, 504, and 34. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because the complainant-witness could not credibly support the prosecution's case and no corroborating evidence was presented. The court held that without substantive witness testimony establishing the alleged assault and injury, the accusations could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts