State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon. vs Samadhan Vasudev Mehenge. Advocate - Beg TA — 132/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU180002882025

Filing Number

214/2025

Filing Date

20-Mar-2025

Registration No

132/2025

Registration Date

20-Mar-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Sangrampur

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

277

Police Station

Tamgaon

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra Through PSO Tamgaon.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Samadhan Vasudev Mehenge. Advocate - Beg TA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court suspended criminal proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC due to the investigating officer's failure to submit chemical analysis reports despite the chargesheet being filed, making the trial's success unlikely. The accused was discharged, bail bond cancelled, and seized materials were ordered to be destroyed as per procedure after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  5. 08-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  7. 20-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 20-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 132/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court suspended criminal proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC due to the investigating officer's failure to submit chemical analysis reports despite the chargesheet being filed, making the trial's success unlikely. The accused was discharged, bail bond cancelled, and seized materials were ordered to be destroyed as per procedure after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case