State of Maharashtra vs Vitthal Sakharu Pawar — 144/2019

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHBU170008612019

Filing Number

766/2019

Filing Date

04-Nov-2019

Registration No

144/2019

Registration Date

04-Nov-2019

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

264

Police Station

Lonar

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vitthal Sakharu Pawar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court acquitted Vitthal Pawar of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC due to defective investigation, missing chemical analyzer report, and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite repeated summons. The court found it impractical to continue the case and disposed of it as part of a Special Drive for case clearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    N.B.W._Unready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  7. 01-Aug-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC

  8. 21-May-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Lonar

  9. 21-Mar-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Lonar

  10. 06-Jan-2025

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Lonar

  11. 15-Nov-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Lonar

  12. 13-Sep-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Lonar

  13. 05-Jul-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Lonar

  14. 22-May-2024

    B.W._Unready

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Lonar

  15. 06-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt.CJJD and JMFC Lonar

  16. 15-Dec-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  17. 21-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  18. 15-Jul-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  19. 13-Apr-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  20. 07-Jan-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  21. 12-Oct-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  22. 15-Sep-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  23. 29-Jul-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  24. 20-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  25. 30-Mar-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  26. 30-Dec-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  27. 23-Sep-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  28. 03-Jul-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  29. 10-Mar-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  30. 11-Dec-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  31. 23-Oct-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  32. 29-Jul-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  33. 22-May-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  34. 20-Feb-2020

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  35. 25-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 04-Nov-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 144/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted Vitthal Pawar of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC due to defective investigation, missing chemical analyzer report, and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite repeated summons. The court found it impractical to continue the case and disposed of it as part of a Special Drive for case clearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case