State of Maharashtra vs Bhagwat Ramkrushna Hade Advocate - Mapari DP — 278/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498a,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU170007832022
Filing Number
677/2022
Filing Date
12-09-2022
Registration No
278/2022
Registration Date
12-09-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
235
Police Station
Lonar
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bhagwat Ramkrushna Hade Advocate - Mapari DP
Ramkrushna @ Ramkisan Dattatray @ Dattuji Hade
Adv. Mapari DP
Radhabai Ramkrushna Hade
Adv. Mapari DP
Bhakti @ Sangita Ramkrushna Hade
Adv. Mapari DP
Dnyaneshwar Devidas Shinde
Adv. Mapari DP
Gita Purushottam Bonde
Adv. Mapari DP
Mukta Ram Garole
Adv. Mapari DP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 04-10-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Lonar Judicial Magistrate Court on March 11, 2026, acquitted all seven accused in a domestic violence and cruelty case (IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 with section 34). The court found the prosecution failed to prove charges of physical/mental harassment, extortion of ₹2 lakh, threats, and intimidation against the complainant despite her testimony, as corroborating evidence from defense witnesses was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Lonar Judicial Magistrate Court on March 11, 2026, acquitted all seven accused in a domestic violence and cruelty case (IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 with section 34). The court found the prosecution failed to prove charges of physical/mental harassment, extortion of ₹2 lakh, threats, and intimidation against the complainant despite her testimony, as corroborating evidence from defense witnesses was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts