State of Maharashtra vs Bhagwat Ramkrushna Hade Advocate - Mapari DP — 278/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498a,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHBU170007832022

Filing Number

677/2022

Filing Date

12-Sep-2022

Registration No

278/2022

Registration Date

12-Sep-2022

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

235

Police Station

Lonar

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498a,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhagwat Ramkrushna Hade Advocate - Mapari DP

  2. 2.Ramkrushna @ Ramkisan Dattatray @ Dattuji Hade

    Adv. Mapari DP

  3. 3.Radhabai Ramkrushna Hade

    Adv. Mapari DP

  4. 4.Bhakti @ Sangita Ramkrushna Hade

    Adv. Mapari DP

  5. 5.Dnyaneshwar Devidas Shinde

    Adv. Mapari DP

  6. 6.Gita Purushottam Bonde

    Adv. Mapari DP

  7. 7.Mukta Ram Garole

    Adv. Mapari DP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Lonar Judicial Magistrate Court on March 11, 2026, acquitted all seven accused in a domestic violence and cruelty case (IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 with section 34). The court found the prosecution failed to prove charges of physical/mental harassment, extortion of ₹2 lakh, threats, and intimidation against the complainant despite her testimony, as corroborating evidence from defense witnesses was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  6. 26-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  7. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  8. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  9. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  10. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  11. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  12. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  13. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  14. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  15. 11-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  16. 21-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  17. 05-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  18. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  19. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  20. 15-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  21. 30-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  22. 20-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  23. 07-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  24. 18-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  25. 31-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  26. 14-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  27. 19-Jun-2023

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  28. 12-Apr-2023

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  29. 27-Feb-2023

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  30. 20-Jan-2023

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  31. 12-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 12-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 278/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Lonar Judicial Magistrate Court on March 11, 2026, acquitted all seven accused in a domestic violence and cruelty case (IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 with section 34). The court found the prosecution failed to prove charges of physical/mental harassment, extortion of ₹2 lakh, threats, and intimidation against the complainant despite her testimony, as corroborating evidence from defense witnesses was insufficient to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case