State of Maharashtra vs Prabhu Tulshiram Pawar Advocate - Mapari DP — 234/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU170007482022
Filing Number
646/2022
Filing Date
30-08-2022
Registration No
234/2022
Registration Date
30-08-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
69
Police Station
Bibi
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Prabhu Tulshiram Pawar Advocate - Mapari DP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 30-12-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
| 30-09-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
| 20-05-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court acquitted accused Prabhu Pawar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65E) by stopping proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The acquittal was based on investigative defects (missing chemical analyzer report), the accused's consistent absence despite repeated summons, and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence, making further proceedings impractical. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court acquitted accused Prabhu Pawar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65E) by stopping proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The acquittal was based on investigative defects (missing chemical analyzer report), the accused's consistent absence despite repeated summons, and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence, making further proceedings impractical. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts