Bhagyashri Suresh Panchal vs Suresh Achitrao Panchal Advocate - Ambhore B.R — 9/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,18,19,20,21,22,23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

PWDVA Appln.

CNR: MHBU170003842025

e-Filing Number

20-03-2025

Filing Number

297/2025

Filing Date

24-Mar-2025

Registration No

9/2025

Registration Date

24-Mar-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules Section 12,18,19,20,21,22,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhagyashri Suresh Panchal

    Adv. Mapari DP

  2. 2.Arya Suresh Panchal

    Adv. Protection officer woman and Child Development Department Lonar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Achitrao Panchal Advocate - Ambhore B.R

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Court Order Summary This is a Marathi matrimonial case under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court partially allowed the petition, granting interim maintenance of ₹3,500/month to the petitioner (woman) and ₹2,200/month to her minor child, effective from the date of the order. The court directed the respondent (her husband) not to commit any acts of domestic violence and instructed police and protection officers to ensure compliance with the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  9. 06-Apr-2026

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  11. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  12. 30-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  14. 26-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  15. 11-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  16. 02-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  17. 20-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  18. 13-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  19. 28-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  20. 01-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  21. 12-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  22. 25-Aug-2025

    Documents

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  23. 04-Aug-2025

    Documents

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  24. 24-Jul-2025

    Documents

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  25. 25-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  26. 30-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  27. 25-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  28. 24-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 24-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary This is a Marathi matrimonial case under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court partially allowed the petition, granting interim maintenance of ₹3,500/month to the petitioner (woman) and ₹2,200/month to her minor child, effective from the date of the order. The court directed the respondent (her husband) not to commit any acts of domestic violence and instructed police and protection officers to ensure compliance with the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case