Bharat Rambhau Sirsat vs Ramesh Ganesh Talekar Advocate - Awachar SA — 25/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHBU170002392024

List of Witness

Next Hearing

15th July 2026

e-Filing Number

15-03-2024

Filing Number

40/2024

Filing Date

19-03-2024

Registration No

25/2024

Registration Date

19-03-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Bharat Rambhau Sirsat

Adv. Mundhe SB

Respondent(s)

Ramesh Ganesh Talekar Advocate - Awachar SA

Manda Ramesh Talekar

Adv. Awachar SA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

29-04-2026

List of Witness

11-03-2026

List of Witness

14-01-2026

List of Witness

03-12-2025

List of Witness

08-10-2025

List of Witness

Interim Orders

15-07-2024
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Lonar, rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC on 15/07/2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary proof of constructing a house, cattle shed, or go-down on the suit land (Gat No. 4), despite these claims being central to his injunction plea. The defendants' title over their constructed property was supported by a registered sale-deed (2013) witnessed by the plaintiff himself, making the properties entirely distinct and the balance of convenience favor the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Lonar, rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC on 15/07/2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary proof of constructing a house, cattle shed, or go-down on the suit land (Gat No. 4), despite these claims being central to his injunction plea. The defendants' title over their constructed property was supported by a registered sale-deed (2013) witnessed by the plaintiff himself, making the properties entirely distinct and the balance of convenience favor the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case