Bharat Rambhau Sirsat vs Ramesh Ganesh Talekar Advocate - Awachar SA — 25/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: List of Witness. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

List of Witness Next hearing 15-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHBU170002392024

e-Filing Number

15-03-2024

Filing Number

40/2024

Filing Date

19-Mar-2024

Registration No

25/2024

Registration Date

19-Mar-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bharat Rambhau Sirsat

    Adv. Mundhe SB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Ganesh Talekar Advocate - Awachar SA

  2. 2.Manda Ramesh Talekar

    Adv. Awachar SA

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  7. 06-Aug-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  8. 25-Jun-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  9. 23-Apr-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  10. 18-Mar-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  11. 04-Feb-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  12. 11-Dec-2024

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  13. 09-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  14. 18-Sep-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  15. 07-Aug-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  16. 15-Jul-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Lonar, rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC on 15/07/2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary proof of constructing a house, cattle shed, or go-down on the suit land (Gat No. 4), despite these claims being central to his injunction plea. The defendants' title over their constructed property was supported by a registered sale-deed (2013) witnessed by the plaintiff himself, making the properties entirely distinct and the balance of convenience favor the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  17. 15-Jul-2024

    Compliance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  18. 12-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  19. 05-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  20. 28-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  21. 24-Jun-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  22. 24-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  23. 21-Jun-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  24. 19-Jun-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  25. 19-Jun-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  26. 12-Jun-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  27. 09-May-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  28. 22-Apr-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  29. 06-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  30. 30-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar

  31. 20-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 19-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 25/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Civil Judge Junior Division, Lonar, rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 CPC on 15/07/2024. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he did not provide documentary proof of constructing a house, cattle shed, or go-down on the suit land (Gat No. 4), despite these claims being central to his injunction plea. The defendants' title over their constructed property was supported by a registered sale-deed (2013) witnessed by the plaintiff himself, making the properties entirely distinct and the balance of convenience favor the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case