State of Maharashtra vs Rekha Shantaram Bhosle Advocate - More SS — 777/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU170000362021
Filing Number
24/2021
Filing Date
07-01-2021
Registration No
777/2023
Registration Date
07-01-2021
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Lonar
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
337
Police Station
Lonar
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rekha Shantaram Bhosle Advocate - More SS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC, Lonar
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Filing of Surety
Filing of Surety
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 30-10-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 18-09-2025 | Filing of Surety |
| 29-07-2025 | Filing of Surety |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Court acquitted accused Rekha Bhosle in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) case by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, citing defective investigation (missing chemical analyzer report), repeated failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons, and the impracticality of continuing the case. The court exercised its discretion to dispose of the matter under a Special Drive initiative while directing the seized material to the excise department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Court acquitted accused Rekha Bhosle in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E) case by stopping proceedings under CrPC Section 258, citing defective investigation (missing chemical analyzer report), repeated failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons, and the impracticality of continuing the case. The court exercised its discretion to dispose of the matter under a Special Drive initiative while directing the seized material to the excise department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts