Rukhamabai Trimbak Dhurandhar vs Samadhan Sampat Dhurandhar — 22/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Civil M.A.
CNR: MHBU160004762025
e-Filing Number
16-04-2025
Filing Number
91/2025
Filing Date
19-Apr-2025
Registration No
22/2025
Registration Date
19-Apr-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Motala
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rukhamabai Trimbak Dhurandhar
Adv. Sonune PS
-
2.Suryabhan Trimbak Dhurandhar
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
3.Sumanbai Vijay Wakode
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
4.Prakash Ramchandra Tayde
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
5.Kamina Bhimrao Tayde
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
6.Ravindra Bhimrao Tayde
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
7.Gautam Bhimrao Tayde
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
8.Sunita Shamrao Tayde
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
9.Sandeep Shamrao Tayde
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
10.Shubham Shamrao Tayde
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
11.Aruna Devidas Wakode
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
12.Shila Hindurao Kambale
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
-
13.Panchfula Prakash Suradkar
Adv. KSHIRSAGAR MILIND SURESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Samadhan Sampat Dhurandhar
-
2.Ramakant Sampat Dhurandhar
-
3.Nirmala Udaybhan Dhurandhar
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
08-Apr-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
25-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
02-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application filed by Respondent No. 2 to set aside the "no say order" dated 07/01/2026 is allowed. The court found that Respondent No. 2's reasons for failing to file his response within the prescribed time (unavailability of important documents) were convincing, and that denying him the right to defend would prejudice him. Respondent No. 2 is directed to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the applicants, after which the previous "no say order" will be set aside and his response will be taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
22-Dec-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
24-Nov-2025
W.S. and Say
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
15-Nov-2025
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
15-Oct-2025
Appearance
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
17-Sep-2025
Awaiting Notice
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
03-Sep-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
18-Aug-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
15-Jul-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
23-Jun-2025
Hearing
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
09-Jun-2025
Steps
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Motala
-
23-Apr-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
23-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2025
Summary: The application filed by Respondent No. 2 to set aside the "no say order" dated 07/01/2026 is allowed. The court found that Respondent No. 2's reasons for failing to file his response within the prescribed time (unavailability of important documents) were convincing, and that denying him the right to defend would prejudice him. Respondent No. 2 is directed to pay Rs. 500 as costs to the applicants, after which the previous "no say order" will be set aside and his response will be taken on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts