State Of Maharashtra. vs Chhaya Ramdas Mante — 163/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 465,467,468,471,120-B,420,511. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU150007272025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
620/2025
Filing Date
06-08-2025
Registration No
163/2025
Registration Date
06-08-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.
FIR Details
FIR Number
74
Police Station
Deulgaon Raja
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Chhaya Ramdas Mante
Ramdas Maroti Mante
Kavita Kaduba Vanve
Madhukar Govindrao Bondre
Nivrruti Hanumantrao Wagh
Seema Gajanan Mante
Jagannath Maroti Magar
Jyoti Jagannath Magar
Abhishek Jagannath Magar
Fake Meera Alasi
Baban Devkate
Rahul Sarjerao Gadekar
Vikas Rambhau Mule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.
Charge
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Charge |
| 05-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 02-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 18-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 15-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for return of seized mobile device (VIVO Y 200 PRO 5G) filed by Rahul Sarjerao Gadekar under Section 497 of Bharatiya Nagarik Surakshya Sanhita was allowed. The court ordered the mobile be handed over to the applicant upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 17,000, with conditions that he cannot sell, mortgage, or alter the device without court permission, and must produce it when ordered until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for return of seized mobile device (VIVO Y 200 PRO 5G) filed by Rahul Sarjerao Gadekar under Section 497 of Bharatiya Nagarik Surakshya Sanhita was allowed. The court ordered the mobile be handed over to the applicant upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs. 17,000, with conditions that he cannot sell, mortgage, or alter the device without court permission, and must produce it when ordered until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts