State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Andhera vs Sunil Bhagwan Tambekar Advocate - Ramane RB — 318/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHBU150006782021

Case disposed

Filing Number

579/2021

Filing Date

17-07-2021

Registration No

318/2021

Registration Date

17-07-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

12th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

152

Police Station

Andhera

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,504,506

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Andhera

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sunil Bhagwan Tambekar Advocate - Ramane RB

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.

12-05-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Arguments

24-02-2026

Arguments

20-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

12-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Deulgaonraja acquitted Sunil Bhagwan Tambeker of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 504, and 506 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused intentionally caused injury to the complainant's son with a wooden stick or made threatening statements, as the testimony of the prosecution witnesses was not credible or coherent enough to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Deulgaonraja acquitted Sunil Bhagwan Tambeker of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 324, 504, and 506 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish that the accused intentionally caused injury to the complainant's son with a wooden stick or made threatening statements, as the testimony of the prosecution witnesses was not credible or coherent enough to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case