State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Andhera vs Mukinda Suresh Salve Advocate - Thumake NR — 575/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65D. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU150006182022
Filing Number
512/2022
Filing Date
16-07-2022
Registration No
575/2023
Registration Date
16-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja
Judge
2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
187
Police Station
Andhera
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Andhera
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mukinda Suresh Salve Advocate - Thumake NR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-01-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-11-2025 | Arguments |
| 01-11-2025 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Mukinda Suresh Salve of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(D), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally possessed and intended to sell 5 liters of liquor. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no independent witness was examined, no chemical analysis report was submitted, and the seizure panchnama witnesses were not properly examined regarding the illegal nature of the seized liquor, resulting in reasonable doubt about the legitimacy of the seizure itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted the accused Mukinda Suresh Salve of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(D), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused illegally possessed and intended to sell 5 liters of liquor. The court noted critical evidentiary gaps: no independent witness was examined, no chemical analysis report was submitted, and the seizure panchnama witnesses were not properly examined regarding the illegal nature of the seized liquor, resulting in reasonable doubt about the legitimacy of the seizure itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts