State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Andhera vs Snatosh Dinkar Mundhe Advocate - Wayal RK — 42/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,294,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHBU150001872024

Case disposed

Filing Number

166/2024

Filing Date

20-02-2024

Registration No

42/2024

Registration Date

20-02-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja

Judge

1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

134

Police Station

Andhera

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,294,506

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Andhera

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Snatosh Dinkar Mundhe Advocate - Wayal RK

Dinkar Bandu Mundhe

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.

15-05-2026

Disposed

02-05-2026

Arguments

13-04-2026

Arguments

11-03-2026

Arguments

20-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
Copy of Judgment

Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court at Deulgaonraj (Buldhana district) acquitted both accused—Santosh Dinkar Mundhе (age 43) and Dinkar Bandу Mundhе (age 78)—of charges under IPC sections 324, 294, 506 with section 34. The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused assaulted the complainant with fists and stones and made abusive threats on May 13, 2023, the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the sole prosecution witness's testimony did not meet the required evidentiary standard to connect the accused to the alleged crime, resulting in their acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court at Deulgaonraj (Buldhana district) acquitted both accused—Santosh Dinkar Mundhе (age 43) and Dinkar Bandу Mundhе (age 78)—of charges under IPC sections 324, 294, 506 with section 34. The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused assaulted the complainant with fists and stones and made abusive threats on May 13, 2023, the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the sole prosecution witness's testimony did not meet the required evidentiary standard to connect the accused to the alleged crime, resulting in their acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case