State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Andhera vs Snatosh Dinkar Mundhe Advocate - Wayal RK — 42/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,294,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU150001872024
Filing Number
166/2024
Filing Date
20-02-2024
Registration No
42/2024
Registration Date
20-02-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
Andhera
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Andhera
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Snatosh Dinkar Mundhe Advocate - Wayal RK
Dinkar Bandu Mundhe
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court at Deulgaonraj (Buldhana district) acquitted both accused—Santosh Dinkar Mundhе (age 43) and Dinkar Bandу Mundhе (age 78)—of charges under IPC sections 324, 294, 506 with section 34. The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused assaulted the complainant with fists and stones and made abusive threats on May 13, 2023, the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the sole prosecution witness's testimony did not meet the required evidentiary standard to connect the accused to the alleged crime, resulting in their acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The First Class Magistrate Court at Deulgaonraj (Buldhana district) acquitted both accused—Santosh Dinkar Mundhе (age 43) and Dinkar Bandу Mundhе (age 78)—of charges under IPC sections 324, 294, 506 with section 34. The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused assaulted the complainant with fists and stones and made abusive threats on May 13, 2023, the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court ruled that the sole prosecution witness's testimony did not meet the required evidentiary standard to connect the accused to the alleged crime, resulting in their acquittal under CrPC section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts