State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Deoulgaon Raja vs Rahul Kisan Jaybhay Advocate - Ghewande PB — 46/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHBU150001062022
Filing Number
82/2022
Filing Date
01-02-2022
Registration No
46/2022
Registration Date
01-02-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja
Judge
1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
467
Police Station
Deulgaon Raja
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra, Thru Police Station Deoulgaon Raja
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rahul Kisan Jaybhay Advocate - Ghewande PB
Namdev Pandharinath Bongane
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CIVIL JUDGE JR.DN. J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 31-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 25-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, Deulgaonraja, Buldhana District, Maharashtra Decision Date: April 13, 2026 The court acquitted both accused (Rahul Kisan Jaybhaye and Namdev Pandrinath Bongane) of all charges under IPC Sections 392 (dacoity) and 34 (common intention). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged robbery at the complainant's card shop on November 3, 2021, despite presenting ten witnesses and material evidence. The court found inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and ruled that reasonable doubt favors the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, Deulgaonraja, Buldhana District, Maharashtra Decision Date: April 13, 2026 The court acquitted both accused (Rahul Kisan Jaybhaye and Namdev Pandrinath Bongane) of all charges under IPC Sections 392 (dacoity) and 34 (common intention). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed the alleged robbery at the complainant's card shop on November 3, 2021, despite presenting ten witnesses and material evidence. The court found inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and ruled that reasonable doubt favors the accused's acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts