Pushpa Pandharinath Wayal vs Vimal Tateba Jaybhay — 9/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Dismissal Order Next hearing 15-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHBU150000462022

Filing Number

12/2022

Filing Date

19-Jan-2022

Registration No

9/2022

Registration Date

19-Jan-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Deulgaonraja

Judge

2-Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pushpa Pandharinath Wayal

    Adv. Bhala GP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vimal Tateba Jaybhay

  2. 2.Manohar Tateba Jaybhay

  3. 3.Dnyaneshwar Tateba Jaybhay

  4. 4.Sunita Manohar Jaybhay

  5. 5.Anil Bhaurao Jaybhay

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Dismissal Order

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  9. 07-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  10. 13-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  11. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  12. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  13. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  14. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  15. 10-May-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  16. 25-Apr-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  17. 15-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  18. 22-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  19. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  20. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  21. 13-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  22. 28-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  23. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  24. 30-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  25. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  26. 24-Apr-2024

    Issues

    Jt.CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  27. 03-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  28. 28-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  29. 12-Jan-2024

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Case Summary The court dismissed the petition (Issues 1-3) and rejected the interim relief application (Issue 4) filed by the plaintiff. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership, court-ordered possession, or irreparable harm regarding the disputed agricultural property. The plaintiff provided insufficient documentary evidence (only a 7/12 extract) and did not substantiate critical claims with supporting documents such as sale deeds, affidavits, or police complaint records, resulting in the dismissal of the application for interim injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  30. 12-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  31. 24-Nov-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  32. 21-Sep-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  33. 08-Sep-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  34. 07-Aug-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  35. 10-Jul-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  36. 10-Apr-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  37. 02-Mar-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  38. 01-Feb-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  39. 12-Jan-2023

    Order on Exh

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  40. 12-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  41. 28-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  42. 18-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  43. 08-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  44. 06-Apr-2022

    Ex-Parte Order

    CIVIL Judge Jr.dn. J.M.F.C.

  45. 20-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  46. 19-Jan-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 9/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court dismissed the petition (Issues 1-3) and rejected the interim relief application (Issue 4) filed by the plaintiff. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of ownership, court-ordered possession, or irreparable harm regarding the disputed agricultural property. The plaintiff provided insufficient documentary evidence (only a 7/12 extract) and did not substantiate critical claims with supporting documents such as sale deeds, affidavits, or police complaint records, resulting in the dismissal of the application for interim injunction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case