State of Maharashtra through PSO Mehkar vs Vinod Ratan Shingane — 1006/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU140021592024

Filing Number

1452/2024

Filing Date

22-Nov-2024

Registration No

1006/2024

Registration Date

22-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Mehkar

Judge

1-Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

514

Police Station

Mehkar

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through PSO Mehkar

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinod Ratan Shingane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Vinod Shingne under Section 258 of CrPC for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (illegal liquor possession), citing the accused's continued absence despite multiple summons and warrants issued over more than a year, and lack of a Competent Authority Report. The accused was discharged, and 9 bottles of confiscated country liquor were ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.

  4. 15-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.

  5. 08-May-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.

  6. 22-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 22-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1006/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Vinod Shingne under Section 258 of CrPC for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (illegal liquor possession), citing the accused's continued absence despite multiple summons and warrants issued over more than a year, and lack of a Competent Authority Report. The accused was discharged, and 9 bottles of confiscated country liquor were ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case