State of Maharashtra vs Pandhari Vithoba Gaikwad — 1985/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU140014562020
Filing Number
1319/2020
Filing Date
30-09-2020
Registration No
1985/2022
Registration Date
30-09-2020
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Mehkar
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
291
Police Station
Janephal
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pandhari Vithoba Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Mehkar.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 03-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 09-06-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 24-12-2024 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. and discharged the accused Pandhari in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, citing that over four years had passed since the 2020 charge sheet with the accused remaining absent despite multiple summons and no Competency Assessment report filed. Seized materials will be destroyed after the appeal period expires, and the case is closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of Cr.P.C. and discharged the accused Pandhari in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e) case, citing that over four years had passed since the 2020 charge sheet with the accused remaining absent despite multiple summons and no Competency Assessment report filed. Seized materials will be destroyed after the appeal period expires, and the case is closed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts