The State Of Maharashtra vs Sunil Papalal Pimple Advocate - Awsarmol SU — 1887/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU130030912023

Filing Number

2709/2023

Filing Date

14-Dec-2023

Registration No

1887/2023

Registration Date

14-Dec-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

853

Police Station

Chikhli

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

1.The State Of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Sunil Papalal Pimple Advocate - Awsarmol SU

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court discharged the accused Sunil under Section 258 of the CrPC due to prolonged pendency without progress in a summary triable case involving charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused's repeated absence and failure to secure his presence justified stopping proceedings and releasing him with the effect of discharge, while cancelling bail bonds and forfeiting any cash security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
03-Feb-2026

N.B.W._Unready

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
04-Sep-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
25-Jun-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
21-Mar-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
19-Dec-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
21-Sep-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
16-Apr-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
14-Dec-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
14-Dec-2023

Case filed

Registration No. 1887/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Sunil under Section 258 of the CrPC due to prolonged pendency without progress in a summary triable case involving charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused's repeated absence and failure to secure his presence justified stopping proceedings and releasing him with the effect of discharge, while cancelling bail bonds and forfeiting any cash security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.