The State Of Maharashtra vs Ganesh Shankar Kharat Advocate - Jadhao SN — 1785/2018

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(D). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU130028852018

Filing Number

2642/2018

Filing Date

28-Dec-2018

Registration No

1785/2018

Registration Date

28-Dec-2018

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

351

Police Station

Amdapur

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(D)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Shankar Kharat Advocate - Jadhao SN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged accused Ganesh Shankar Kharat under Section 258 of the CrPC, finding that the matter had remained pending without effective progress despite being summary triable under Section 65(d) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused's consistent absence and inability to secure his presence justified stopping the proceedings and releasing him from charges, while bail bonds were cancelled and seized liquor was directed to be disposed by the Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  5. 16-Sep-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  6. 23-Jan-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  7. 17-Oct-2024

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  8. 21-May-2024

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  9. 02-Mar-2024

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  10. 25-Jan-2024

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  11. 25-Oct-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  12. 04-Aug-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  13. 13-May-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  14. 04-Apr-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  15. 05-Jan-2023

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  16. 13-Oct-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  17. 05-Aug-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  18. 27-Jun-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  19. 18-May-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  20. 13-Jan-2022

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  21. 13-Oct-2021

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  22. 24-May-2021

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  23. 24-Sep-2020

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  24. 24-Mar-2020

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  25. 24-Oct-2019

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  26. 28-Jun-2019

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  27. 16-Apr-2019

    Plea / Particulars

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  28. 28-Dec-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 28-Dec-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1785/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged accused Ganesh Shankar Kharat under Section 258 of the CrPC, finding that the matter had remained pending without effective progress despite being summary triable under Section 65(d) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The accused's consistent absence and inability to secure his presence justified stopping the proceedings and releasing him from charges, while bail bonds were cancelled and seized liquor was directed to be disposed by the Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case