The State Of Maharashtra vs Rahul Siddivinayak Bondre — 1738/2025
Case under Maharashtra Police Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU130027892025
Filing Number
2460/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
1738/2025
Registration Date
14-11-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C., Chikhli
Decision Date
20th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rahul Siddivinayak Bondre
Sanjay Bhagwan Rathod
Laxman Januji Ghumare
Santosh Vinayakrao Ambekar
Prakash Rambhau Awchar
Sanjay Namdeorao Pandhare
Vinod Ramesh Bendwal
Shailesh Prabhakar Khedkar
Vijay Bansi Ambhore
Shailesh Subodh Sawaji
Satish Joseph Mehendre
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.M.F.C., Chikhli
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 10-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 25-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 11-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted all eleven accused persons charged under Section 37(1)(3) read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting insufficient evidence, lack of independent witnesses, missing documentary proof (flags, posters), and no credible proof of the District Magistrate's order allegedly in force during the alleged protest on 21 June 2024 against the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted all eleven accused persons charged under Section 37(1)(3) read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting insufficient evidence, lack of independent witnesses, missing documentary proof (flags, posters), and no credible proof of the District Magistrate's order allegedly in force during the alleged protest on 21 June 2024 against the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts