The State Of Maharashtra vs Rahul Siddivinayak Bondre — 1738/2025

Case under Maharashtra Police Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU130027892025

Filing Number

2460/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

1738/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Siddivinayak Bondre

  2. 2.Sanjay Bhagwan Rathod

  3. 3.Laxman Januji Ghumare

  4. 4.Santosh Vinayakrao Ambekar

  5. 5.Prakash Rambhau Awchar

  6. 6.Sanjay Namdeorao Pandhare

  7. 7.Vinod Ramesh Bendwal

  8. 8.Shailesh Prabhakar Khedkar

  9. 9.Vijay Bansi Ambhore

  10. 10.Shailesh Subodh Sawaji

  11. 11.Satish Joseph Mehendre

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court acquitted all eleven accused persons charged under Section 37(1)(3) read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting insufficient evidence, lack of independent witnesses, missing documentary proof (flags, posters), and no credible proof of the District Magistrate's order allegedly in force during the alleged protest on 21 June 2024 against the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  9. 06-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  12. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  14. 20-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  15. 09-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  17. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1738/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted all eleven accused persons charged under Section 37(1)(3) read with Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, noting insufficient evidence, lack of independent witnesses, missing documentary proof (flags, posters), and no credible proof of the District Magistrate's order allegedly in force during the alleged protest on 21 June 2024 against the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case