The State Of Maharashtra vs Rahul Siddivinayak Bondre — 1737/2025

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU130027872025

Filing Number

2458/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

1737/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 188
Maharashtra Police Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rahul Siddivinayak Bondre

  2. 2.Laxman Januji Ghumare

  3. 3.Sanjay Bhagwan Rathod

  4. 4.Santosh Vinayakrao Ambekar

  5. 5.Datta Shankar Kakas

  6. 6.Eknath Pandhari Chavan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Chikhli First Class Magistrate Court acquitted all six accused Congress party workers of charges under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to lawful order) and Maharashtra Police Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately violated the District Magistrate's assembly ban order while protesting against an Income Tax raid on Congress party bank accounts in March 2024, as no credible independent evidence or documentary proof was presented to establish the violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  10. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  12. 14-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  14. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  15. 09-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  16. 25-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And J.m.f.c., Chikhli

  17. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1737/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Chikhli First Class Magistrate Court acquitted all six accused Congress party workers of charges under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to lawful order) and Maharashtra Police Act Section 135. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused deliberately violated the District Magistrate's assembly ban order while protesting against an Income Tax raid on Congress party bank accounts in March 2024, as no credible independent evidence or documentary proof was presented to establish the violation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case