The State of Maharashtra through Excise Depatment vs Hanuman Ananda Gavhate Advocate - Gawai AS — 1373/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU130023992022
Filing Number
2085/2022
Filing Date
29-08-2022
Registration No
1373/2022
Registration Date
29-08-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli
Judge
3-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
Chikhli
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra through Excise Depatment
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Hanuman Ananda Gavhate Advocate - Gawai AS
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 21-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 23-09-2025 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court discharged accused Gajanan Shivaji More of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Section 65) for illegal possession of brewery liquor worth Rs. 4,985 because the prosecution failed to file a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report, which was essential to establish prima-facie that the seized substance was actually liquor. The proceedings were stopped under Section 258 CrPC, and the seized liquor was ordered to be disposed by the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court discharged accused Gajanan Shivaji More of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Section 65) for illegal possession of brewery liquor worth Rs. 4,985 because the prosecution failed to file a Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report, which was essential to establish prima-facie that the seized substance was actually liquor. The proceedings were stopped under Section 258 CrPC, and the seized liquor was ordered to be disposed by the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts