The State Of Maharashtra vs Dashrath Ramrao Gaikwad Advocate - Awsarmol SU — 789/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU130013752023

Filing Number

1199/2023

Filing Date

14-Jun-2023

Registration No

789/2023

Registration Date

14-Jun-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

319

Police Station

Chikhli

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

1.The State Of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Dashrath Ramrao Gaikwad Advocate - Awsarmol SU

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The court discharged the accused Dashrath under Section 258 of the CrPC due to prolonged delay and lack of progress in the summary triable case involving alleged violation of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Section 65(e)). The court found that the accused had been absent since the first hearing and effective proceedings could not be secured, warranting termination of the case with the effect of discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
03-Feb-2026

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
18-Sep-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
16-Jan-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
24-Sep-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
10-May-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
14-Feb-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
10-Oct-2023

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
14-Jun-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
14-Jun-2023

Case filed

Registration No. 789/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused Dashrath under Section 258 of the CrPC due to prolonged delay and lack of progress in the summary triable case involving alleged violation of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Section 65(e)). The court found that the accused had been absent since the first hearing and effective proceedings could not be secured, warranting termination of the case with the effect of discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.