Savita Rameshkumar Malode vs Bhimrao Kachru Gawai Advocate - Chavan SP — 110/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39(1)(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 31st July 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU130013262023
Next Hearing
31st July 2026
Filing Number
169/2023
Filing Date
08-06-2023
Registration No
110/2023
Registration Date
08-06-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli
Judge
3-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Savita Rameshkumar Malode
Adv. Yandait SN
Respondent(s)
Bhimrao Kachru Gawai Advocate - Chavan SP
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-11-2025 | Evidence |
| 10-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In Civil Suit No. 110/2023 (Savita v. Bhimrao), the defendant's application for temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiff from alienating or encumbering the suit property was rejected. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in defendant's favor, and no irreparable loss, noting that the plaintiff had already obtained the loan and entered into a sale agreement while retaining possession as per earlier orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Civil Suit No. 110/2023 (Savita v. Bhimrao), the defendant's application for temporary injunction to restrain the plaintiff from alienating or encumbering the suit property was rejected. The court found no prima facie case, no balance of convenience in defendant's favor, and no irreparable loss, noting that the plaintiff had already obtained the loan and entered into a sale agreement while retaining possession as per earlier orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts