The State Of Maharashtra vs Chand Ramjan Hiriwale Advocate - Shaikh TA — 672/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU130011722023
Filing Number
1011/2023
Filing Date
23-May-2023
Registration No
672/2023
Registration Date
23-May-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
245
Police Station
Chikhli
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chand Ramjan Hiriwale Advocate - Shaikh TA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary The court discharged the accused Chand Hiriwale in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act section 65(e) case by stopping proceedings under CrPC section 258, citing lack of progress and the accused's continuous absence since the first hearing. All bail bonds were cancelled, any cash security was forfeited, and seized liquor was directed to be disposed by the Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
03-Feb-2026
N.B.W._Unready
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
20-Aug-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
06-Feb-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
14-Nov-2024
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
03-Jun-2024
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
07-Feb-2024
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
18-Sep-2023
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
23-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 672/2023
Case Summary The court discharged the accused Chand Hiriwale in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act section 65(e) case by stopping proceedings under CrPC section 258, citing lack of progress and the accused's continuous absence since the first hearing. All bail bonds were cancelled, any cash security was forfeited, and seized liquor was directed to be disposed by the Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts