The State Of Maharashtra vs Sikandar Ashraf Barde Advocate - Shaikh TA — 668/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(d). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHBU130011632023

Filing Number

1003/2023

Filing Date

22-May-2023

Registration No

668/2023

Registration Date

22-May-2023

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 20-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

Raipur

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(d)

Petitioner(s)

1.The State Of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.Sikandar Ashraf Barde Advocate - Shaikh TA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Summary The court discharged the accused Shantaram under Section 258 of the CrPC due to lack of progress in a summary trial involving alleged violations of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Section 65(e)). The accused's continued absence and failure to secure his presence made further proceedings unjustifiable, warranting stoppage of proceedings and his release from charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Mar-2026

Disposed

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
03-Feb-2026

N.B.W._Unready

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
25-Sep-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
05-Feb-2025

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
14-Nov-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
03-Jun-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
07-Feb-2024

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
18-Sep-2023

Plea / Particulars

Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
22-May-2023

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
22-May-2023

Case filed

Registration No. 668/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged the accused Shantaram under Section 258 of the CrPC due to lack of progress in a summary trial involving alleged violations of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act (Section 65(e)). The accused's continued absence and failure to secure his presence made further proceedings unjustifiable, warranting stoppage of proceedings and his release from charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.