The State Of Maharashtra vs Shantaram Sandu Wagh Advocate - Awsarmol SU — 658/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHBU130011532023
Filing Number
994/2023
Filing Date
18-May-2023
Registration No
658/2023
Registration Date
18-May-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 20-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
Chikhli
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shantaram Sandu Wagh Advocate - Awsarmol SU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged the accused Shantaram under Section 258 of the CrPC, stopping proceedings in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e)) due to unexplained delays and the accused's continuous absence since the first hearing. The court found the matter could not remain pending indefinitely in a summary triable case, thereby releasing the accused from all charges with effect of discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
03-Feb-2026
N.B.W._Unready
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
08-Sep-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
07-Jan-2025
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
23-Sep-2024
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
05-Apr-2024
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
12-Dec-2023
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
16-Aug-2023
Plea / Particulars
Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
-
18-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 658/2023
The court discharged the accused Shantaram under Section 258 of the CrPC, stopping proceedings in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e)) due to unexplained delays and the accused's continuous absence since the first hearing. The court found the matter could not remain pending indefinitely in a summary triable case, thereby releasing the accused from all charges with effect of discharge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts