The State Of Maharashtra vs Laxman Sadashiv Pawar Advocate - Shaikh TA — 72/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,323,504,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHBU130006932022

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

Filing Number

586/2022

Filing Date

10-03-2022

Registration No

72/2022

Registration Date

10-03-2022

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

FIR Details

FIR Number

6

Police Station

Andhera

Year

2011

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 143,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

The State Of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Laxman Sadashiv Pawar Advocate - Shaikh TA

Ramdhan @ Samadhan Laxman Pawar

Dnyaneshwar Laxman Pawar

Subhash Sadashiv Pawar

Nivrutti Subhash Pawar

Vijaya Laxman Pawar

Ranjana Subhash Pawar

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

17-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

28-01-2026

Evidence

29-11-2025

Evidence

11-08-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

11-03-2026
Evidence

This is a witness examination record (affidavit/deposition) in Marathi from FIR Case No. 72/2022, not a final court order. The witness (Sanjay Pralahad Bambel) initially testified about being assaulted by defendants on 13.09.2011, but during cross-examination recanted his entire statement, admitting he gave false testimony and that the accused did not actually assault him or his wife. The examination was completed on 11.03.2026 before the First Class Magistrate at Chikhli. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness examination record (affidavit/deposition) in Marathi from FIR Case No. 72/2022, not a final court order. The witness (Sanjay Pralahad Bambel) initially testified about being assaulted by defendants on 13.09.2011, but during cross-examination recanted his entire statement, admitting he gave false testimony and that the accused did not actually assault him or his wife. The examination was completed on 11.03.2026 before the First Class Magistrate at Chikhli. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case