Payal Pramod Gawai ( Name Before Marriage) vs Pramod Pratap Gawai — 62/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHBU130006492024
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2024
Filing Number
537/2024
Filing Date
13-03-2024
Registration No
62/2024
Registration Date
02-04-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Payal Pramod Gawai ( Name Before Marriage)
Adv. Shaikh TA
Respondent(s)
Pramod Pratap Gawai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 15-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 23-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 11-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application (FIR Case No. 62/2024) and set aside the previous order dated 26.11.2024 that had directed the respondent to file a written reply. The respondent, who was unable to appear in court due to being out of station for official work, is now permitted to file a written reply within the extended time period. The court imposed costs of Rs. 500 on the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the petitioner's application (FIR Case No. 62/2024) and set aside the previous order dated 26.11.2024 that had directed the respondent to file a written reply. The respondent, who was unable to appear in court due to being out of station for official work, is now permitted to file a written reply within the extended time period. The court imposed costs of Rs. 500 on the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts