Kailas Kaduba Salve vs The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 62/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHBU130005832026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

514/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

62/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

3-2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kailas Kaduba Salve

    Adv. YANGAD DILIP VITTHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted the petitioner's application for temporary custody of a seized Honda vehicle (Registration: MH28 AW 2521) on the condition of depositing a ₹50,000 bond, finding that the petitioner is the legitimate owner and that prolonged police custody would deteriorate the vehicle. The court imposed strict conditions including prohibition on sale, pledge, or use in criminal activities, and required insurance coverage and detailed documentation before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    2nd Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner's application for temporary custody of a seized Honda vehicle (Registration: MH28 AW 2521) on the condition of depositing a ₹50,000 bond, finding that the petitioner is the legitimate owner and that prolonged police custody would deteriorate the vehicle. The court imposed strict conditions including prohibition on sale, pledge, or use in criminal activities, and required insurance coverage and detailed documentation before release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case