The State Of Maharashtra vs Vijay Tulshiram Tarmale Advocate - Sonalkar SR — 64/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHBU130005722021

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

498/2021

Filing Date

30-03-2021

Registration No

64/2021

Registration Date

30-03-2021

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

FIR Details

FIR Number

179

Police Station

Raipur

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 420,34
TRADE MARKS ACT Section 102,103,104
COPYRIGHT ACT Section 51,63

Petitioner(s)

The State Of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vijay Tulshiram Tarmale Advocate - Sonalkar SR

Vijay Deoraj Bhala

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

22-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

30-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

05-11-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

05-11-2025
Evidence
16-02-2026
Evidence
11-03-2026
Evidence

This is a witness examination record (FIR Case No. 64/2021) in a criminal case involving alleged smuggling of banned "Kali Unt" bidi (cigarettes). The witness testified regarding seizure panchnama proceedings conducted on specified dates, confirmed the seizure of purchase receipts from the accused, and acknowledged giving his statement to police. Cross-examination by both accused's counsels was declined, and the court accepted the witness's statement as recorded on 11.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a witness examination record (FIR Case No. 64/2021) in a criminal case involving alleged smuggling of banned "Kali Unt" bidi (cigarettes). The witness testified regarding seizure panchnama proceedings conducted on specified dates, confirmed the seizure of purchase receipts from the accused, and acknowledged giving his statement to police. Cross-examination by both accused's counsels was declined, and the court accepted the witness's statement as recorded on 11.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case