Vijay Kisan Mahale vs Radhabai Uttam Mahale — 12/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHBU130002312025
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
e-Filing Number
04-01-2025
Filing Number
23/2025
Filing Date
28-01-2025
Registration No
12/2025
Registration Date
29-01-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli
Judge
2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vijay Kisan Mahale
Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR
Lata Gajanan Mahale
Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR
Ranjit Gajanan Mahale
Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR
Vikas Gajanan Mahale
Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR
Usha Dnyandev Suradkar
Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR
Shantabai Shamrao Solanki
Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR
Sindhubai Gangaram Hade
Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR
Bebibai Ramdas Theng
Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR
Rangrao Namdeo Mahale
Tejrao Namdeo Mahale
Bhagwan Namdeo Mahale
Vimal Narsingh Solanki
Kamal Santosh More
Mandodari Jalamsingh Solanki
Narayan Sahebrao Mahale
Sukhdeo Tukaram Mahale
Respondent(s)
Radhabai Uttam Mahale
Gajanan Uttam Mahale
Block Development Officer
Indu Bhagirath Sapkal
Mina Subhash Solanki
Sarla Raju Parihar
Sanjay Vinayak Pawar
Jaysing Vinayak Pawar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 02-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 01-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 11-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary In R.C.S. No.12/2025, the Joint Civil Judge rejected the plaintiffs' application for ex-parte injunction, finding insufficient evidence of urgency or irreparable harm. Notice has been issued to defendants to show cause why the injunction should not be granted, and the court allowed pleadings and examination of plaintiffs as per their choice. The matter involves a partition suit concerning Hindu joint family property previously decreed in R.C.S. No.43/2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In R.C.S. No.12/2025, the Joint Civil Judge rejected the plaintiffs' application for ex-parte injunction, finding insufficient evidence of urgency or irreparable harm. Notice has been issued to defendants to show cause why the injunction should not be granted, and the court allowed pleadings and examination of plaintiffs as per their choice. The matter involves a partition suit concerning Hindu joint family property previously decreed in R.C.S. No.43/2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts