Vijay Kisan Mahale vs Radhabai Uttam Mahale — 12/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 25-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHBU130002312025

e-Filing Number

04-01-2025

Filing Number

23/2025

Filing Date

28-Jan-2025

Registration No

12/2025

Registration Date

29-Jan-2025

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Chikhli

Judge

2-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

Last updated 20-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Kisan Mahale

    Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR

  2. 2.Lata Gajanan Mahale

    Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR

  3. 3.Ranjit Gajanan Mahale

    Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR

  4. 4.Vikas Gajanan Mahale

    Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR

  5. 5.Usha Dnyandev Suradkar

    Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR

  6. 6.Shantabai Shamrao Solanki

    Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR

  7. 7.Sindhubai Gangaram Hade

    Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR

  8. 8.Bebibai Ramdas Theng

    Adv. KAVIMANDAN PRADEEP DIGAMBAR

  9. 9.Rangrao Namdeo Mahale

  10. 10.Tejrao Namdeo Mahale

  11. 11.Bhagwan Namdeo Mahale

  12. 12.Vimal Narsingh Solanki

  13. 13.Kamal Santosh More

  14. 14.Mandodari Jalamsingh Solanki

  15. 15.Narayan Sahebrao Mahale

  16. 16.Sukhdeo Tukaram Mahale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Radhabai Uttam Mahale

  2. 2.Gajanan Uttam Mahale

  3. 3.Block Development Officer

  4. 4.Indu Bhagirath Sapkal

  5. 5.Mina Subhash Solanki

  6. 6.Sarla Raju Parihar

  7. 7.Sanjay Vinayak Pawar

  8. 8.Jaysing Vinayak Pawar

Case History

  1. 25-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  3. 02-May-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  8. 29-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  10. 08-Oct-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  11. 29-Sep-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  12. 29-Aug-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  14. 21-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  15. 05-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  16. 15-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  17. 01-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary In R.C.S. No.12/2025, the Joint Civil Judge rejected the plaintiffs' application for ex-parte injunction, finding insufficient evidence of urgency or irreparable harm. Notice has been issued to defendants to show cause why the injunction should not be granted, and the court allowed pleadings and examination of plaintiffs as per their choice. The matter involves a partition suit concerning Hindu joint family property previously decreed in R.C.S. No.43/2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 01-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. and JMFC Chikhali

  19. 30-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 28-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In R.C.S. No.12/2025, the Joint Civil Judge rejected the plaintiffs' application for ex-parte injunction, finding insufficient evidence of urgency or irreparable harm. Notice has been issued to defendants to show cause why the injunction should not be granted, and the court allowed pleadings and examination of plaintiffs as per their choice. The matter involves a partition suit concerning Hindu joint family property previously decreed in R.C.S. No.43/2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case