Sureshkumar Netramji Sharma vs State of Maharashtra — 247/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
M.A.C.P.
CNR: MHBU110012782021
Filing Number
475/2021
Filing Date
29-Sep-2021
Registration No
247/2021
Registration Date
29-Sep-2021
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sureshkumar Netramji Sharma
Adv. More SS
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
-
2.Superintend of Police
-
3.Police Inspector, Malkapur Rural
-
4.Vijaysingh Diwansingh Rajput
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
17-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence Part Heard
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
09-Jul-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
01-Jan-2025
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
26-Jun-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
10-May-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Mar-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2024
Evidence
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2023
Steps
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
18-Oct-2023
Lok-Nyayalaya
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
30-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
12-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
14-Jun-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Malkapur rejected an application filed by Respondent No. 2 seeking to add the motorcycle owner and insurance company as necessary parties to the claim petition. The tribunal held that the claimant is not obligated to implead all necessary parties at the filing stage, and since negligence is alleged only against the police vehicle (not the motorcycle rider), adding these parties is not necessary at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
29-Mar-2023
Hearing
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Feb-2023
Hearing
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2023
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
02-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
14-Sep-2022
Written Statement
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
27-Jul-2022
Notice_Unready
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
22-Jun-2022
Notice_Unready
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge
-
06-Apr-2022
Notice_Unready
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
02-Feb-2022
Notice_Unready
Adhoc District Judge-1 and Asstt. Sessions Judge
-
09-Dec-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 247/2021
Summary: The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Malkapur rejected an application filed by Respondent No. 2 seeking to add the motorcycle owner and insurance company as necessary parties to the claim petition. The tribunal held that the claimant is not obligated to implead all necessary parties at the filing stage, and since negligence is alleged only against the police vehicle (not the motorcycle rider), adding these parties is not necessary at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts