Sagar Kushkumar Verulkar vs Sunil Kisan Patil Urfa Suralkar — 53/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHBU110009022025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

15-09-2025

Filing Number

400/2025

Filing Date

16-09-2025

Registration No

53/2025

Registration Date

16-09-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur

Judge

1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(3)

Petitioner(s)

Sagar Kushkumar Verulkar

Adv. SAGAR BHARAT SURYAVANSHI

Respondent(s)

Sunil Kisan Patil Urfa Suralkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Order

06-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Order

25-02-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application to cancel anticipatory bail granted to Sunil Kisan Patil, holding that the informant failed to prove breach of bail conditions. The court found that the Investigating Officer, being aware of the conditions, would have approached the court if the accused violated them, and noted that investigation was completed without being hampered. Additionally, no evidence showed the accused was properly summoned to court, so his non-appearance could not be deemed deliberate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the application to cancel anticipatory bail granted to Sunil Kisan Patil, holding that the informant failed to prove breach of bail conditions. The court found that the Investigating Officer, being aware of the conditions, would have approached the court if the accused violated them, and noted that investigation was completed without being hampered. Additionally, no evidence showed the accused was properly summoned to court, so his non-appearance could not be deemed deliberate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case