Sagar Kushkumar Verulkar vs Prafull Raghunath Dane — 52/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHBU110009012025
e-Filing Number
15-09-2025
Filing Number
399/2025
Filing Date
16-Sep-2025
Registration No
52/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur
Judge
1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sagar Kushkumar Verulkar
Adv. SAGAR BHARAT SURYAVANSHI
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prafull Raghunath Dane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The Additional Sessions Judge, Malkapur rejected the applicant's plea to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to respondent Prafulla Raghunath Dane, finding insufficient evidence of breach of bail conditions. The court held that the applicant lacked personal knowledge of the accused's non-attendance at the police station, the investigating officer took no corrective action despite being aware of conditions, and the investigation was completed without hindrance. Regarding court attendance, the court noted no evidence that charge-sheet information or summons was served on the accused, thus he could not be held liable for non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
20-Jan-2026
Order on Exhibit
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
03-Jan-2026
Compliance
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
Order on Exhibit
-
17-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Order
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
07-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
15-Oct-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
30-Sep-2025
Hearing
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
26-Sep-2025
Reply/Say
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
24-Sep-2025
Notice_Unready
District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge
-
20-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2025
The Additional Sessions Judge, Malkapur rejected the applicant's plea to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to respondent Prafulla Raghunath Dane, finding insufficient evidence of breach of bail conditions. The court held that the applicant lacked personal knowledge of the accused's non-attendance at the police station, the investigating officer took no corrective action despite being aware of conditions, and the investigation was completed without hindrance. Regarding court attendance, the court noted no evidence that charge-sheet information or summons was served on the accused, thus he could not be held liable for non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts