Sagar Kushkumar Verulkar vs Prafull Raghunath Dane — 52/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHBU110009012025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

15-09-2025

Filing Number

399/2025

Filing Date

16-09-2025

Registration No

52/2025

Registration Date

16-09-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur

Judge

1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(3)

Petitioner(s)

Sagar Kushkumar Verulkar

Adv. SAGAR BHARAT SURYAVANSHI

Respondent(s)

Prafull Raghunath Dane

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Judge-1 Addl. Sess. Judge

11-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Order

06-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Order

25-02-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Additional Sessions Judge, Malkapur rejected the applicant's plea to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to respondent Prafulla Raghunath Dane, finding insufficient evidence of breach of bail conditions. The court held that the applicant lacked personal knowledge of the accused's non-attendance at the police station, the investigating officer took no corrective action despite being aware of conditions, and the investigation was completed without hindrance. Regarding court attendance, the court noted no evidence that charge-sheet information or summons was served on the accused, thus he could not be held liable for non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Sessions Judge, Malkapur rejected the applicant's plea to cancel the anticipatory bail granted to respondent Prafulla Raghunath Dane, finding insufficient evidence of breach of bail conditions. The court held that the applicant lacked personal knowledge of the accused's non-attendance at the police station, the investigating officer took no corrective action despite being aware of conditions, and the investigation was completed without hindrance. Regarding court attendance, the court noted no evidence that charge-sheet information or summons was served on the accused, thus he could not be held liable for non-appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, Malkapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case